🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to prohibit social media access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are observing closely to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

European Movement

Across Europe, a rising number of nations are considering similar bans.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister declaring that mobile devices and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". The policy could be enacted in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to implement a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have suggested that an Australian-model ban remains "one of the options under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has called on the legislature to approve a law increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a similar move, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has recommended guardians to block their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a non-binding statement demanding a ban for minors unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it highlights of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"A clear age barrier is a solid foundation," stated the MEP supporting the measure.

Britain: A Watchful Eye

In the UK, the leadership has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "no option is discarded" but stressing any action must be "based on robust data".

Last year, momentum built behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. Nonetheless, the government vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have raised apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a girl who died after viewing harmful social media material suggests that a blanket age ban might not make platforms safer and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when users turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the inability of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for children," commented a prominent peer.

America: A Decentralized Picture

Stateside, action is mostly happening at the regional level amid country-wide gridlock.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for minors to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a bill banning under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has passed a regulation restricting minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with any further use requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced bills demanding adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and calls from certain politicians to copy the Australian example, a federal ban is right now seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Outside of the West, other countries are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, international bodies strike a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "might backfire". The organization highlights that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

While this worldwide debate evolves, the actions of this nation and its followers show that policymakers internationally are increasingly willing to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.