🔗 Share this article

Europe breathed a deep collective sigh of relief on Monday, as the crisis triggered by the introduction of a new 28-article proposal for ending the war appeared – briefly – to have been contained. A American diplomat spoke of "substantial progress" after Ukraine-US talks in Geneva. On Monday night, Russian leadership made its countermove: a renewed assault of missile and drone strikes on Kyiv.

The Pattern of Peace Talks and Military Action

The chain of contrasting events captured the harsh reality of the current period. By day, political struggles are waged: positive announcements are released from different nations. Significant resources is expended on managing specific proposals. By night, the Kremlin brutally reminds the world that, for them, war remains the key method for achieving "resolution".

Nocturnal Warfare

As military strikes progressed into the early hours of Tuesday, the current condition of Ukraine's vulnerability was revealed. Ukraine is equipped to monitor rocket firings from across the border, a capacity provided through timely intelligence. From observation points, defense planes that had been dispatched to engage hostile cruise missiles roared overhead – advanced fighter aircraft provided to Ukraine by European allies.

Moments later, Kyiv's missile defense activated: multiple launches fired to intercept a incoming threat. This was a sophisticated defense system at work, presumably supplied through partner states. Every launch shakes the surroundings, shaking the windows. The moment of terror quickly gives way to grim resignation: perhaps the hostile projectile won't hit its mark this time, sparing the city from devastation and further power outages.

Continuous Dangers

Soon after, a automatic firearm opened up on a aerial vehicle in the vicinity, part of a rapid response unit – probably Western-made equipment. Unfortunately, the bullets missed the opposing UAV – it pressed on overhead toward its target.

Intermittently, this continued until dawn. Kyiv greeted the daybreak reports: seven people killed, destruction and utility failures in many homes as a result of the night's assault. As always, everyone still continued their routines – living the war. But those 24 hours demonstrated Ukraine's critical military reliance on international aid – a need that European nations are clearly incapable to replace in the near term.

Failed Diplomacy

The comprehensive proposal from US administration provoked deep reactions, debate and deep concern – and momentarily shifted focus from Ukraine's largest corruption scandal in years. Yet, we have seen this script before, after previous diplomatic encounters and international summits.

Every new initiative from American administration adheres to the identical sequence: a negotiation push against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with other European capitals, manages to fend off. They contain the crisis but never actually win the battle. This pattern will, certainly, persist.

Strategic Calculations

It is convenient to criticize certain parties of consistently pushing Russian terms. But that does not seem to be the entire situation. Washington operates on a assumption familiar among international relations experts: you cannot secure via talks what you have lost on the battlefield. The US administration assumes that it is unfeasible to pressure the Kremlin to abandon the territory that it already controls in Ukraine's occupied territories.

The challenge is that while accepting these circumstances, Washington does little to deter Moscow, through words or deeds, from believing that the situation will not change more in its benefit in the coming year.

Conflicting Perspectives

Therefore, the Kremlin is convinced that duration works to their advantage – that Ukraine and its allies are nearing depletion. Their motivation to sign a deal that does not give them the maximum possible gain is virtually nonexistent. There may be numerous efforts to achieve ceasefire, but they will carry on as long as Russia's leadership remains highly assured in the conclusion.

On the contrary, Ukraine's government believes that Ukraine can still hold out, progressively conceding lives and land but avoiding a complete military breakdown until conditions improve in its favour.

Current Realities

Objectively, there are no genuine requirements for a truce. Now, individual motivations are coming into play: personal goals to negotiate peace and obtain worldwide acknowledgment, and Ukrainian leadership's double obstacles – on one hand, not to alienate a key ally, and on the other, to unite the population around the flag against any plan Kyiv finds unworkable, so that their focus does not shift toward internal issues. And although their mission will now be considerably more difficult after latest incidents, it remains quite doubtful that this will modify their basic position.

These opposing factors are guiding negotiations.

Summary and Prospects

It took a only one week to eliminate the suggested clauses of the most recent proposal. Assertive and inconsistent approach of the matter by Washington, opposition by Ukraine and the rest of Europe, along with pacifying measures of diplomats, and finally, current information leaks, all served their function.

While new plans based on established approaches are forthcoming, Kyiv, London and other allied nations should draw one fundamental conclusion: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to resist negotiation assaults from Washington that are founded on Moscow's terms and demonstrate particular unwillingness to modify developments, if they remain united and improve their protective measures at a much faster pace. If they do, neither political nor armed coercion will be able to defeat them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capability to repel nightly air assaults will, for the coming months, largely rely on ongoing international assistance.